Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that . A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. [CDATA[> Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. A decision by the editor in chief is the . This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. . Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". Thank you for visiting nature.com. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. 2002 Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Need help with your experiments? A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. To obtain 5 Answers. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. [CDATA[> Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. Cactus Communications. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. [CDATA[> Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Does this mean a rejection letter is about to come? Is it possible to create a concave light? Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. All Rights Reserved. 2. Do the revisions and resubmit. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Dont infer anything from unavailable data. AE stands for Associate Editor. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. :-). 9.3 weeks. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. On submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor covering the subject area, who seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and who makes this initial decision. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Your IP: Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Did you find it helpful? Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Alternatively, they may be considering that you submit to another journal within Nature, where there may be a better match. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? typoresubmitstagedecision sent to author&, proofproofnaturepublish, ScienceNatureScienceScience, Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected)The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implicationsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsscienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsBoard of Reviewing EditorsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editorsscienceconnection, 22, Peer-review, Peer-review, 2. Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Second reason: methodological approach and results. Since then we have received nearly 600 manuscripts and presubmission enquiries. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. If so, how close was it? Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? [CDATA[// >